Thursday, September 1, 2011

Plagiarism do the Lines Blur



During the past few classes
We have discussed academic integrity. Pick two Areas of Knowledge (Math, Natural Science, Human Science, History, Art & Ethics). Compare and contrast how plagiarism would be defined for these two Areas of Knowledge.

Your response should be a word-processed document consisting of at least 10 sentences

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Super Max Prison



A clean cell in hell awaits hijacker

The purpose of Supermax, the most secure jail in the world, is to turn the prisoner into a nonentity

Florence, Colorado - If the jury sentences 20th hijacker and unrepentant terrorist sup­porter Zacarias Moussaoui to death, he will go to hell. But if he is sentenced to live, he will come immediately to a place that many consider to be worse.

Supermax sits just outside this town. Its six big guard towers looming even before you get to the gate of the most secure jail in the world, the Administrative Maximum Facility, a place where prisoners who evade a quick death go to die, the only way they can escape.

Supermax is the major industry in Florence, a town of 3,653 cordial folk who often sip coffee while waiting for the breakfast of eggs and chicken fried steak at Big D's Cafe, and sell $2 pamphlets on the dinosaur tracks found up the road near the big town, Canon City.

The locals love their prison, and brag it exists here because of community action. They raised money to buy the site and lobby for the US government to build the Supermax here, in­cluding selling T-shirts with a map of the area; and they sold out. Supermax provides around 700 full-time jobs, and freelance or part-time income for around 1,000 others, by local estimates.

Florence is actually a booming little town. Canon City is the home of the Museum of Colorado Prisons - and Colorado has a rich and colourful history in that area.

The Super 8 Motel charges tourists $61 (2,300 baht) a night for a decent room. It lists the tourist attractions in the lobby: Florence Flower Shop, Florence Mortuary and Florence High School. This is not a town that gets a lot of tourists and it lives all right without them, thanks to the constant employment down the road.

Richard Reid, the shoe-bomber, is a "guest" at Supermax. So is Theodore Kaczynski, the American terrorist Unabomber and Rarnzi You­sef, who wanted to kill the Pope in Manila after he tried but failed to bring down the World Trade Center in New York in 1993.

Also in here is the blind Egyptian cleric Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman. Remember him? Well, that is the point. When the jury says "Guilty," and you pass through the gates of Supermax, no one re­members you any more.

There is a press room but no interview facilities. Moussaoui and his counterparts in Supermax get their last shot at fame the day the verdict is passed, and then the publicity lights go out, probably forever. Rahman's pro-terrorist lawyer Lynne Stewart was convicted of terrorist conspiracy for carrying notes to him in Supermax.

Supermax has yielded to one prisoner. The American terrorist Timothy McVeigh – Moussaoui called him "the greatest Ameri­can" – got out of the world's most secure prison. He was placed in a cell for a short time, a very short time at Terre Haute prison in Indiana, and then strapped to a table and put to death with drug injections.

McVeigh, executed in 2001, was the first prisoner sentenced to death by a US federal court in 38 years.

This week, Amnesty International issued its annual condemnation of US executions, but all 60 last year came from trials in state courts, usually for murder.

US federal courts try crimes committed against the entire country - treason, murder of federal officials, kidnapping and bank robberies where the criminals cross state lines. Life sentences are far more common than death, even when murders are involved.

Apart from McVeigh, every other of the almost 400 prisoners in Florence has taken a one-way trip: McVeigh helper Terry Nichols; Mafia boss John Gotti; the Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard; the Navy, CIA and FBI turncoats John Walker, Aldrich Ames, Robert Hanssen; Charles Har­relson, father of actor Woody and the murderer of a judge.

And don't expect ever to hear of these people again. When Supermax guards tell you that prisoners are in isolation, that is exactly what they mean. "Not much I can tell ya, “says a guard over a brew on Main Street in Florence, "except when they come to us, they just kind of disappear from the rest of the world. That's the way it's designed”

The cells in Supermax are scrupulously clean. Each has a bed, a toilet, a table, a shelf, a sink, hot water. Any advert writer could make it sound like the $61 Super 8 Motel room where reporters stay. Maybe even better, be­cause at Supermax, no one can break into your room and steal your possessions. It's just that you don't have possessions at Supermax, and the rooms are just a tad claustrophobic at 12 by 7 feet - 3.65 by 2.13 metres. Contact with other prisoners isn't just banned; it is impossible because of the solid steel and cement walls, and the door with one small slit, angled up. It's just that guests at the Supermax stay in their rooms for 23 hours a day, and cable-TV is not part of the package.

If Moussaoui is sentenced to life rather than death, he can expect amenities. The food will be nutritious, the Koran will be high quality, and other religious items such as a prayer mat and hat and clean-up towel all will be provided.

There is that daily hour outside the sound­proofed, absolutely sterile cell, of course, as­suming the prisoner has not lost his only daily privilege through misbehaviour. Three guards carrying batons with metal tips come for the prisoner, handcuff him and shackle his legs. He gets to shuffle alone around an exercise yard, built so the prisoner cannot see the sky.

The sky, of course, is a sign of freedom, and in Supermax Florence, freedom's just another word for nothing. Or perhaps for death.

Guards in a central location can control the movements of prisoners in the several cell blocks so the men never see another human other than their minders.

When the Florence prison opened, its project manager Russ Martin told the press, “These guys will never be out of their cells, much less in the yard or anywhere around here,” in sur­rounding Colorado. With special permission, or in an emergency, prisoners also are allowed to go to the prison medical unit, get a haircut or use a basic but functioning law library that exists on each cell block.

The purpose of Supermax, Florence, however, is to turn the prisoner into a nonentity. There have already been a couple of unsuccessful lawsuits that claimed incarceration in Supermax was a violation of human rights - cruel and unusual punishment, as the US constitution puts it. Aldrich Ames, arguably the most no­torious spy in American history, said the sterile, scrupulous daily routine at Supermax was driving him insane.

An earlier super-maximum prison called "Marion is a violent attack on human rights", says a prisoner-friendly essay at the web site of the Committee to End the Marion Lockdown. "Florence is even worse - an outrage! It's designed to destroy." ALAN DAWSON

­
Answer the following:
A. Is staying in a Supermax prison less humane then receiving the death penalty.

B. Which of the following words listed below would you use to help describe the article (you may use wikipedia to help you out).
Areas of Knowledge: Ethics
1. Altruism

2. Cultural imperialism

3. Duty ethics

4. Egoism

5. Golden rule

6. Moral absolutism

7. Moral principle

8. Moral relativism

9. Veil of ignorance

10. Self-interest theory

11. Special pleading

12. Utilitarianism

13. Value-judgment

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Calvin & Hobbs: Cheating



Calvin: Today at school, I tried to decide whether to cheat on my test or not. I wondered, is it better to do the right thing and fail…or is it better to do the wrong thing and succeed? On the one hand, undeserved success gives no satisfaction…but on the other hand, well-deserved failure gives no satisfaction either. Of course, most everybody cheats some time or other. People always bend the rules if they think they can get away with it. Then again, that doesn’t justify my cheating. Then I thought, look, cheating on one little test isn’t such a big deal. It doesn’t hurt anyone. But then I wondered if I was just rationalizing my unwillingness to accept the consequence of not studying. Still, in the real world, people care about success, not principles. Then again, maybe that’s why the world is such a mess. What a dilemma!

Hobbes: So what did you decide?
Calvin: Nothing. I ran out of time and I had to turn in a blank paper.
Hobbes: Anymore, simply acknowledging the issue is a moral victory.
Calvin: Well, it just seemed wrong to cheat on an ethics test

The ends justifies the means... cartoon

The Right to be a Racist

Rights violated: accused racist

Father challenges seizure of children by authorities

WINNIPEG – A Winnipeg father accused of teaching his children racist views has filed a constitutional challenge and claims his rights to freedom of expression and religion have been violated.

The father and his wife, who can't be named to protect the identity of their children, are set for a legal showdown with Child and Family Services over custody of their seized kids. A weeklong trial is slated to begin May 25, and the father is seeking an automatic ruling in their favour by citing numerous alleged violations under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

CFS seized the children last spring based on concerns about their emotional well-being after the girl showed up at her elementary school with hate propaganda inked on her body. Further investigation revealed the kids were being raised in what agency officials described as a "white supremacist" environment. The investigators also raised child protection concerns not related to the parents' beliefs.

The parents -- who are legally married but currently living apart from each other -- have denied any wrongdoing and the father recently filed an affidavit supporting his position.

"(The mother) and I were excellent parents to our biological child (the boy) and to (the girl), both before and after the children were apprehended. I believe that there is no legal basis for the children having been apprehended in the first place," the father wrote.

"State removal of a child from parental custody is a serious interference with the psychological integrity of the parent and infringes every parent's right to a fair hearing pursuant... to the charter," the man's lawyer wrote.

The nature of the parents' belief is expected to play a role both in the charter challenge and in the child protection trial.

In an interview with the Free Press last summer, the mother described herself as "white nationalist... but not a neo-Nazi skinhead." She admitted to postings made on two websites, which include a picture of the couple standing in front of a Nazi flag, with the man raising his arm in salute. She said postings attributed to her husband under a particular pseudonym were made by him. She claimed to have no memory of ones attributed to her under another pseudonym in which she speaks of posting "White Pride" posters, uses racial slurs to describe black people and makes derogatory comments about aboriginals.

"(The children) goose-step all the time. It really is adorable, it's more fun when we're in the mall and I do it, too," she wrote. Her husband claims he has "dedicated my entire life to being a skinhead" and vows to never change.

The father describes the swastika as "an ancient Nordic symbol for peace, life and new beginnings."

This case has generated national and international publicity because of the unique issues involved. The court hearing is expected to address the extent to which the beliefs as expressed by the parents are legally protected and whether educating their children in these beliefs entitled CFS to apprehend the children.

If the father is successful in establishing that his charter rights have been violated, this may prevent the court from hearing evidence about other child protection concerns CFS discovered during their investigation that are unrelated to the parents' racist beliefs.

CFS recently filed a motion to have the media banned from covering the upcoming trial, fearing further coverage of the case will be harmful to the children. Several media outlets, including the Free Press, objected to the proposed ban. A family court judge dismissed the CFS application earlier this week.



Mike McIntyre 14/05/2009

www.mikeoncrime.com

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/rights-violated-accused-racist-44970047.html